Google Cracks Down on Mugshot Sites

Back on February 6, 2013 Jonah Stein and I wrote about the Mugshot Extortion Racket, and how Google needed to crack down on the problem.  Several days ago Google implemented an update that has caused mugshot sites to lose the vast majority of their search traffic, and most importantly, the mugshot sites no longer rank in Google when searching for the names of the individuals pictured.

The Mugshot Racket is a paid unpublishing scam.  Mugshot sites scour the ‘net and copy mugshot photos from law enforcement sites and databases to create search engine optimizated pages that rank well on Google for the subjects’ names.   In apparent violation of the subjects’ personality rights,  the mugshot sites offer to remove photos if a fee is paid, often amounting to hundreds of dollars.   People have reported that after paying for a photo to be removed from one site, it would often pop up on multiple other mugshot sites.

Victims of the scam have been writing to me since February, explaining how these mugshots made it hard to get a job, rent an apartment, or even get a date. In our society we have courts to determine the fair punishment for a crime. Many people arrested are found innocent, have charges dismissed, or the record may be expunged upon completion of a treatment program.  Sometimes it is in society’s interest for people to have a second chance after they’ve committed a minor crime, because we don’t want to create an underclass of unemployable people.

I’m very glad that Google did the right thing. A number of states have been trying to pass laws, and there’s at least one class action lawsuit pending.  Instead of waiting for a patchwork of laws and court rulings that might not have been very effective, in one algorithmic swoop, Google appears to have cleaned up the problem.

The New York Times has published this: Mugged by a Mug Shot Online.


  1. The New York Times says that the update happened Thursday. It can take a few days for any change at Google to take full effect. If your mugshots are still visible on Google, they will probably go away soon. All the ones I tested have disappeared.

  2. There’s a similar scam for bankruptcies at sites like where they try to get people to pay them off via an “independent” delisting company which is obviously run by the same people. They are in Florida like all the best scammers.

    1. You’re right that paid unpublishing in all forms is wrong. Freedom of the press allows people to publish, no doubt. The problem is when they offer to unpublish for a fee. I’d like to see a federal law that says paid unpublishing is illegal, and that any payment processor who clears fees for such an operation is guilty of money laundering. That would stop all these scams. Take away the money, and the motive disappears.

      1. One of my client site is also suffering from such a problem… These sites should provide option to delete listing from their site. There are many network sites around the web that are penalized by Google as of now for duplicating one site on multiple sites of their. And they are making fortune out of that punishment. 🙂

  3. To be clear, it is the mugshot pages’ listings in Google search results that have disappeared, not the mugshot pages, themselves. The mugshot pages remain; and if one happened to set bookmarks to them, then they are still there, online.

    However, beyond that, if one types into the Google search box a person’s name, surrounded by quotation markes, plus a precise phrase from a given mugshot page, also surrounded by quotation marks, said mugshot page will still show-up in Google search results.

    All that appears to have happened, then, is that search results for just persons’ names no longer include mugshot web pages. However, searches for persons’ names which include specific words or phrases from their mugshot pages will still yield results.

    Gregg L. DesElms
    Napa, California USA
    gregg at greggdeselms dot com

  4. This is a nice improvement but there are still many cases where Google returns or rewards useless information. For example, here are two that come to mind: search for any phone number in the US and you will get search results that look promising but turn out to be useless in most cases – just links to pages full of consecutive phone numbers. Or search for any operating system file on your computer that you would like to know how it works or its purpose – again search results that lead to useless or worse, misleading answers. These appear to be areas of opportunity for improvement in Google’s algorithms. I wonder if IBM’s Watson can do a better job on such searches 😉

    1. Excellent observations. Please post about your most hated search spams and scams, and I will bring them to Google’s attention by way of an article.

      1. Now wait lets be fair. The CEO of Google might be looking at this website in fear if we all demand crack down but he will have to make an error of authority regarding our stated power. Now if you believe in Santa Claus so do I. It might have been worse before but now the crack down was just a step and this is our turn. Find further action to make the same angry statement, contact your legislature, consumer action groups, and push an angry letter to stop the practice of this profiterring and demand some attention from entities that seek change. Call Google and thank them for their crackdown while still illustrating that a larger problem exists. Develop a strategy so that large numbers will take action after they Google their own name get terribly pissed. Show the threat to common public and then seek new privacy rights with the new public response. Alot of work is needed to be resolved because the entities that have done this have more power than the consumer. There is just not an entity that can crack down on Google yet, so The public must organize and take action.

  5. I love Google. Every time I read a story like this it makes me happy. So many businesses care only about what directly affects them. Thank you for this post.

  6. I am still seeing mine come up unfortunately in “Image Search”. A lot of the have gone away but some are still coming up. I am REALLY hoping it will just be a matter of time. JailHub and Mugshots .com both seem to be ranking highly for my photos despite having hundreds of photos with my name tagged trying to push the bad ones down.

    1. Hi Ryan,
      i am also a victim, could you suggest how to over come this problem they demand 2000$ to clean.
      do not have that much money

  7. I paid to have photo removed. Now its on when you google my name. What can I do? This is so embarrassing. Open for suggestions. I have emailed twice. They simply don’t care.

  8. is alive and well extorting people to have their information removed. It starts at 399.00. The claim they are operating of of West Inda. I read a oh where it was started by a US attorney who lost his license. Not sure if this is accurate info but I believed it stated he had also lost his license to practice. If true, he is the criminal. Some states have specifically enacted laws, like GA that prohibit these sites, specifically Someone needs to do something. This are just booking pictures withite info and these people are innocent until proven guilty. These sites have the ability to ruin employment opportunities and relationships, etc. this is not freedom of speech as states. It’s extorsion.

  9. I made em really mad when I wrote a BBB complaint. If you wish to seek change, write your congressman and argue they shouldn’t be allowed to abuse federal record to bully profit out of minoirty groups. Argue that federal record should not be marketable commerce. Show them that paying the fee doesn’t stop the advertisment, the company starts all over again with another website and tries to bully even more money. Ask your congressman, Should federal record be abused this way?

  10. There is no crackdown. I just gogled bankruptcy and found peoples name come up at random. Write your congressman and stop the unethical practice. here:

    Josephine XXXXX | Bankruptcy – › FL › Sebring
    Nov 17, 2010 – Address: 2885 XXXXXXXX XXXXX. URL:

    Karen FXXXXXXXXXX | Bankruptcy – › CA › Colton
    Dec 12, 2011 – Address: 1033 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX . URL:

    Susan X XXXXXX | Bankruptcy – › NY › Poughkeepsie
    Jan 24, 2011 – Address: 51 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX NY 12603. URL:

  11. Generally speaking there’s no foul in repackaging public information, Zillow does it, but then again, Zillow won’t charge you $300-400 to remove information about your home. No one is really sure how these people are getting this information, but some suspect they are unlawfully using PACER

  12. How can i get my picture off of mugshots. com? I had a misameandor and paid the company i stole from. I got caught and returned the item.This has been 2 years. I saw my picture on their site today. When I call they said I need to pay $399. For what, I asked. I already taken care of the problem with the retail store. Then they hung up. Could you tell me what I need to do to get my picture off of this asap?

  13. Now Ill be fair:) I tried a name search gain and one of the websites did not show up. I discovered a new website in my google search that advertises my wife’s email as some sort of secret business owned by me, but I diddnt find the reported financial record. I hope it stays for the better.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *